Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli
Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing The Failed Predictions Of Global Warming Skeptics, By Dana Nuccitelli. Discovering how to have reading habit is like discovering how to attempt for consuming something that you truly don't really want. It will certainly require more times to assist. Moreover, it will certainly also bit force to serve the food to your mouth and ingest it. Well, as checking out a book Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing The Failed Predictions Of Global Warming Skeptics, By Dana Nuccitelli, sometimes, if you ought to check out something for your brand-new tasks, you will feel so dizzy of it. Even it is a book like Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing The Failed Predictions Of Global Warming Skeptics, By Dana Nuccitelli; it will certainly make you feel so bad.
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli
Ebook PDF Online Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli
This book explains the science of climate change in plain language and shows that the 2 to 4 percent of climate scientists who are skeptical that humans are the main cause of global warming are a fringe minority―and have a well-established history of being wrong.
• Provides a unique, scientifically backed, and easily understood evaluation of the global temperature predictions made by both climate change skeptics and mainstream climate scientists
• Presents readers with a plethora of concrete, verifiable evidence for the author's claims―information that holds the skeptics and deniers accountable for their history of being wrong regarding their assertions
• Discusses possible solutions to climate change, such as carbon emissions pricing―a concept that has gained bipartisan support among economists
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli- Amazon Sales Rank: #854142 in Books
- Published on: 2015-03-03
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.21" h x .56" w x 6.14" l, .0 pounds
- Binding: Hardcover
- 212 pages
Review "Climatology vs. Psuedoscience does something that has never been done before: it takes specific climate change projections made over the years by pioneering and mainstream climate scientists, and those made by skeptics, comparing them with subsequent temperature measurements to see which has proven a better predictor of what came to pass. . . . [Y]ou owe it to yourself to put your skepticism to the test by reading this book and learning just whose science has proven true." - The Barrie Examiner"Nuccitelli's writing is clear and his explanations lucid. . . . [T]he primary audience for this book is likely to be the much larger group of climate educators, communicators, and interested citizens looking for solid, well-reasoned arguments against some of the most common contrarian claims. For them, this book will stand as a well-written and invaluable resource." - National Center for Science Education"The book includes the best available short account of the history of climate science and describes climate change models and controversies in brief but incisive and well-illustrated detail. . . . Nuccitelli's book is particularly valuable for its succinct treatment of key disputes without the heated rhetoric. Summing Up: Essential. Upper-division undergraduates through professionals and practitioners." - Choice
About the Author
Dana Nuccitelli is an environmental scientist and risk assessor at a private environmental consulting firm in California.
Where to Download Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli
Most helpful customer reviews
31 of 41 people found the following review helpful. This book fills an important and wide open niche. By Gregory T. Laden Dana Nuccitelli has become one of the key people in the international discussion of climate change science. He is co-writer with John Abraham at the Climate Consensus - the 97% blog at the Guardian, and has contributed hundreds of entries to John Cook’s famous site SkepticalScience.com. He has measurably helped people to understand climate change science, as well as the nuances of the false debate based over climate pseudoscience generated by science deniers.And, he’s written a book!Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics fills a wide open niche in the climate science discussion. Dana powers through the literature on climate science, nearly comprehensively identifying and describing instances of the predictions, projections, or assertions made by major climate scientists as well as major climate science deniers. (Though the distinction between denier and non-denier emerged later in the full time frame addressed in the book.) Simply put, Dana compares the two to see which is correct: the projection that human generated greenhouse gas pollution warms the Earth and changes the climate, or the projection that it does not.It turns out it does! But you knew that. But what you might not have realized is the overall time frame of how this situation has developed. Dana skillfully documents the deeply disturbing fact that the issue of global warming (and related things) has been settled for a very long time. Were it not for mainly fossil fuel industry funded anti-science activists, we would not be having this discussion today, and Dana would not have had to write his book. Rather, scientist would be focused on figuring out the remaining and important details of how the Earth’s climate system responds to human pollution as well as natural changes, and policy makers would be busy working out how to keep the Carbon in the ground. We probably would have had a price on Carbon years ago, and we’d probably be running our civilizations off of a very high and ever increasing percentage of clean (non fossil carbon) energy. But no, those denialists had to ruin it for everyone with their fake skepticism.Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics is engagingly written, clear, accurate, non-technical but not watered down. If you know the stuff in this book you can be more confident than ever having those conversations with with your friends Denialist Dan and Warmest Willie. In fact, I would recommend Climatology Versus Pseudoscience along side Michael Mann’s book The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines for a comprehensive treatment of the history of both denialism and the science itself.Dana covers the early days of climate science, discusses the “Astounding Accuracy of Early Climate Models (Chapter 3), discusses the development of the scientific consensus on climate change, and provides an excellent overview of the current situation with greenhouse gas pollution caused climate change.I strongly recommend this book for the general reader, but I would also suggest it for use in certain classes, either in high school or college. If you are a teacher and want to thoroughly cover the “Debate” over climate science, this is the book.
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful. An informative book By bd2999 This is a pretty good work overall that covers the different stages of pseudoscience over some of the range of climate science. In particular various prominent climate models and some of their physical world inputs. It is nice to see these laid out clearly in one place. The work also looks at problems with "climate skeptics" or denier arguments in the context of these models. This is mostly done by pointing out flaws in the underlying premise of what would seem, by the every day joe, as being reasonable.A fair bit of the book, at least a chapter, is devoted to the 97% consensus works, as the author was involved in one of the studies, Some of the attacks on it and so on. It is an interesting section to read and recommended to fully understand any of the non-controversy over the issue. You might as well ask a biologist of evolution is a lie or not. The number would be the same or higher.My only criticism of the book is not because of the work itself but my expectation. I generally was hoping the work would focus a bit more on denier arguments and their problems in relation to real science. The book does that, to be sure, but I was hoping that it be a longer work and cover more of the points used. As all of them have the same defects the author does a good job pointing out.
23 of 32 people found the following review helpful. A fine review of denialist's assertions compared to observed reality By Burrowing Owl I read the book last week, while on vacation in the East Mojave Desert. Much of it is amusing, since the behavior of deniers is itself amusing.There are still people who claim there is a "debate" regarding evolution, just as there are people who claim there is a "debate" about human-caused climate change. In some cases people reject both observed phenomena, based upon the same reasons: the facts are contrary to their cherished yet irrational beliefs. Perhaps among politicians there is still a "debate," but among the world's scientists the debate ended decades ago. As this book shows, scientists have been correct about the physics involves for many decades, such that predictions made in the 1930s have been demonstrated accurate.Scientists have been projecting the effects of human-caused climate change since the 1930s. Some of the oldest projections still show excellent agreement with later observations even more than 70 years later: S.G. Callendar in 1936 (published in 1937) is one fine example. By the end of the 1960s the world's scientists reached consensus regarding the fact that #1 humans have caused and are causing climate change, and #2 the changing climate is a major threat to human society as well as the entire global biosphere. It was not until the start of the 1980s that professional deniers started to fabricate doubt among non-scientists regarding these two facts---- and as this book shows, some of that effort has been amusing even as that effort has harmed people in an evil, immoral, unethical, sinister way.An excellent book.
See all 6 customer reviews... Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana NuccitelliClimatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli PDF
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli iBooks
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli ePub
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli rtf
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli AZW
Climatology versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics, by Dana Nuccitelli Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar